|Unless we're trying to ignore the current whistleblower issues and vaccine scandals with Merck.|
Then suddenly Measles is more important than all the other truly deadly and dangerous things out there.
What is up with this talk about suing people who are vaccine-free?
Reality check. All those parents who are CHOOSING to use vaccine products on their children, how about I sue THEM if their genetically altered vaccine-virus or resistant bacterial strains infect my children, who have multiple gene polymorphisms that put them at increased risk for complications?
These people don't HAVE to use this product. And they REFUSE to use it safely, such as by avoiding public places after vaccination or by correctly identifying disease signs and staying at home instead of medicating to hide the symptoms.
Scientists and vaccine companies know the vaccine strains are more "virulent" or "stronger invivo" as they say in their studies. Their vaccine inserts have warnings that include staying away from pregnant or sick people. The polio vaccine strain that mutated down in Nigeria, for example, goes around killing people.
It just seems to me that if parents want to inject their healthy children with these risky products, they should be held accountable when the products cause side effects or increase risks for others, be it from shifting epidemiology, to mutated strains, to atypical outbreaks.
Case in point: PCV7 (prevnar) was widely used by vaccinating parents, and as a result, encouraged something called serotype replacement, where the little bad buggies were killed off, allowing the big, bad buggies to come in and become resistant not only to the vaccine, but also to antibiotics:
“However, immunization can also place selective pressure on the nasopharyngeal flora, promoting the emergence of new pathogens. A shift towards non-vaccineserotypes has been observed among vaccinees in several studies. 109 In South Africa, the carriage of non-vaccine serotypes was increased from 24% in controls to 36% in the vaccines group. A significant increase was seen in the carriage of serotypes 7 and 15, important causes of invasive disease.109”
Scientists also found an increased risk of contracting bacterial strains that cause antibiotic-resistant ear infections. So because a bunch of parents wanted to vaccinate their children with this crap, MY KIDS are now at increased risk of contracting antibiotic resistant bacterial infections that cause things such as hearing loss or encephalitis.
Another case: Everyone shot themselves up with the pertussis vaccine for years, only to find out last year that the pathogen has now mutated and is showing resistance to the vaccines and to the antibiotics. In addition, those who vaccinated altered their immune systems, increasing their vulnerability to parapertussis:
"In contrast, vaccination led to a 40-fold enhancement of B. parapertussis colonization in the lungs of mice. Though the mechanism behind this increased colonization was not specifically elucidated, it is speculated to involve specific immune responses skewed or dampened by the acellular vaccine, including cytokine and antibody production during infection. Despite this vaccine being hugely effective against B. pertussis, which was once the primary childhood killer, these data suggest that the vaccine may be contributing to the observed rise in whooping cough incidence over the last decade by promoting B. parapertussis infection. "
So now all these vaccinated people are spreading their diseases around with blind ignorance because they 1) refuse to acknowledge that they have a serious illness since they are vaccinated and 2) they choose to mask their illness with medications to keep sending their kids to schools, birthday parties, etc.
Reminds me of the antibiotic overuse issue. I've never used antibiotics, and my children have never used them. We also avoid triclosan. I respect the process of antibiotics and could see using them for a life threatening situation. Oh! WAIT! Except a bunch of other parents poured 'em down their children's throats like candy for every cough and sniffle, and now we have scientists telling us we're in for massive death campaigns from antibiotic-resistant "superbugs." (This article talks about 10 million estimated deaths due to the antibiotic issue. Wow, wonder why the media is talking about measles in the face of 10 million MRSA deaths.)
Wonderful. Thanks, Herd. Wonderful decision you forced onto us ALL. And then you want to whine about suing me. *rolls eyes* If you want to inject your child with disease and contaminants, with pathogens and chemicals, I find that horrid. No, I won't say follow all the others on the internet who say, "It's your choice," because I don't think it's anyone's choice to force unnecessary medical intervention onto defenseless people unless required to immediately save a life when lesser options have failed.
But, at the least, if you're going to stick with it, you should also be stuck with cleaning up the consequences of your choice. Diseases are mutating. Antibiotics and vaccines are failing. Serotype replacement is occurring. Secondary infection is an actual issue. Maternal-fetal immune methods have been interrupted. Epidemiology of childhood illnesses have been shifted. You played with fire and you caught OUR HOMES on fire in the process. Where is OUR retribution? Sue ME? I'm not the one screwing around with the force of nature using rudimentary theories from over a hundred years ago. I'm not the one wantonly altering a system scientists are still struggling to understand.
"Trained immunity is capable of providing non-specific protection from secondary infections. However, the mechanisms of how trained immunity is initiated and maintained remain unclear. Recent research has found that epigenetic changes occurred in innate immune cells when exposed to certain pathogens or their antigens and are an important feature of trained immunity. But the specific genes and biochemical pathways associated with trained cells were unknown."
It's not Measles, it's MRSA
Quick Measles Post